
Three Winners and Losers from the NFL Combine
The NFL Combine always has players who improve their draft stock and some who hurt their draft stock. While some projected stars maintained their status, several under-the-radar prospects dramatically boosted their stock with eye-popping athletic testing, and others left scouts with new concerns. Here’s a breakdown of the biggest winners and losers whose performances could change where they end up getting drafted come April.
Jason Keith - March 3rd, 2026
Winners:
There are the obvious early first-round talent winners like linebacker Sonny Styles, running back Jeremiyah Love, and offensive lineman Spencer Fano, but today I want to focus on some later-round picks that helped improve their stock at this year’s NFL Combine.
1. Mike Washington Jr. - RB, Arkansas
Mike Washington Jr. arguably had the best day of any prospect, including those projected to go in the top of the draft. He posted the fastest forty-yard dash time of any running back at the combine with a time of 4.33 seconds, while coming in second for the position with a 39-inch vertical jump and 10 ‘8 broad jump. His 40 time alone is faster than some of the league's most explosive backs. Jahmyr Gibbs (4.36), Saquon Barkley (4.4), and Jonathan Taylor (4.39). All of this, while being 6 ‘1 and 223 lbs, gives Washington the athletic profile of a home-run hitting workhorse running back.
The Redshirt-Senior combines this with a productive year at Arkansas, posting over 1,000 yards on 6.4 yards per carry. He added a solid 28 catches and 9 total touchdowns, proving he could be a three-down back if needed. Before the combine, Washington Jr. was slotted as a clear day three pick and was closer to the consensus seventh or eighth running back. After the combine, he is now right in the mix for the third running back taken after the two Notre Dame backs in Jeremiyah Love and Jadarian Price, and could see himself being taken on day two of the draft.
2. Jacob Rodriguez - LB, Texas Tech
Jacob Rodriguez was one of the most productive defenders in all of college football last season, but was generally seen as a borderline day two pick who likely would come off the board on day three. While generally undersized for the position, many people were also quick to judge his overall athleticism at the next level. He turned in an outstanding 4.57-second 40-yard dash and matched it with explosive leaping numbers, including a 38.5-inch vertical and a 10 ‘1 broad jump. His movement skills were just as impressive, posting an elite 6.90-second three-cone and a 4.19 short shuttle. Overall, these scores were a big surprise for many evaluators and really turned some heads with his athleticism.
After an outstanding campaign as the leader of Texas Tech’s elite defense, where he saw his name come up in many Heisman conversations mid-season, Rodriguez solidified himself as a very good NFL linebacker prospect after posting above-average athleticism scores at the combine. Overall, his elite tape and leadership with an unexpected combine should help Rodriguez now definitively hear his name called on day two and maybe even in the top-50 come draft night.
3. Taylen Green - QB, Arkansas
Let me preface by saying I don’t think Green’s combine will move him into day one or even day two of the draft. That being said, I think someone will look at the traits Green has and take a shot on him on day three. Green is 6-foot-6, 233 lbs, and ran a 4.36 forty-yard dash time (fastest by a quarterback since Michael Vick), all while breaking other combine records such as the highest vertical jump and furthest broad jump by any quarterback since 2003. He is a freakish athlete at the quarterback position, and I could see many coaches wanting to get the chance to try to polish many of the flaws he has as a quarterback.
Taylen Green’s passing numbers leave something to be desired, as he needs to get more consistent with his eyes and his throwing motion. However, after coming off a strong performance at the Senior Bowl, where he showed consistent growth each day, combined with his elite athletic testing at the combine, could make him an enticing late-round quarterback prospect. Overall, his athletic testing being off the charts alone could take a guy who was considered a borderline undrafted prospect, to someone who should hear his name called mid-day three.
Former Arkansas RB Mike Washington Jr.
Photo by Derick E. Hingle/Getty Images
Former Texas Tech LB Jacob Rodriguez
Photo by Julio Cortez/AP Photo
Former Arkansas QB Taylen Green
Photo by Hank Layton/WholeHogSports
Losers:
Many of the top prospects didn’t help themselves out, but should still be drafted high, while other borderline day one or two guys didn’t help themselves solidify their case. This doesn’t mean these prospects will drop very far, but the combine wasn’t their best day.
1. Cashius Howell - EDGE, Texas A&M
After all the talk about how Rueben Bain’s arm length could be one of the shortest ever, and that would give him problems at the next level, Howell came in with even shorter arms than Bain. Howell coming into the combine was seen as a top thirty prospect and a lock for a day one pick as a speedy rusher off the edge. While he posted solid athleticism scores running a 4.59 forty-yard dash, it wasn’t the elite athleticism teams were looking for after a shocking arm length measurement.
With all this being said, I do still expect Howell to be drafted at some point in the first round. His overall pass rush production in the SEC this past season, mixed with the NFL’s high value placed on pass rushers, should help solidify his day-one status. However, the short arm length mixed with athletic testing that doesn’t jump off the page could see Howell fall towards the twenties, rather than the mid-teens, where he saw himself mocked previously. Overall, the NFL combine hurt the projection of Howell.
2. Emmett Johnson - RB, Nebraska
Emmett Johnson came into the combine widely considered a top-three back behind Notre Dame’s Jeremiyah Love and Jadarian Price. However, after coming in at just 5-foot-10 and 202 lbs (similar to the measurements of Jahmyr Gibbs), scouts would have liked to see a little more burst than his 4.56 forty-yard dash time, which was last among all running backs who participated. Mixed with his subpar agility testing, his stock could dip a bit.
While Johnson’s production and receiving ability could be enough to keep him as a day two selection, his combine likely pushed him into day three. He racked up nearly 1,500 rushing yards on nearly six yards per carry, while adding 46 catches. However, the lack of explosiveness at the combine mixed with his below-average size at the position gives him an uphill battle to be the third running back taken. Athletic testing has been a great measurement for teams to use while evaluating running backs, making Johnson one of the top losers in the combine.
3. Carnell Tate - WR, Ohio State
Carnell Tate is a part of the top tier of wide receivers in this class along-side USC’s Makai Lemon and Arizona State’s Jordyn Tyson. Many scouts considered Tate as their wide receiver one in the class, and he is seen as a taller deep threat. Unfortunately, Tate came in an inch shorter than listed at Ohio State and ran a surprisingly slow 4.53 forty-yard dash. He did not participate in the agility drills or jumping metrics, so he was unable to help his case there.
While I don’t see Tate falling very far due to this, as he has a chance to improve his testing scores at Ohio State’s pro day, he still disappointed many scouts when he had the chance to cement himself as the class’s top wide receiver. He was previously being mocked as high as four or five, I could see Tate slipping into the later top ten or even teens. Overall, the combine left Tate with more questions on whether or not he is worth a top-tier pick, rather than solidifying himself as a top-ten pick or even potentially top five.
Former Texas A&M EDGE Cashius Howell
Photo by Texas A&M Athletics
Former Nebraska RB Emmett Johnson
Photo by Kenny Larabee, KLIN
Former Ohio State WR Carnell Tate
Photo by Mark J. Rebilas/Imagn Images
Create Your Own Website With Webador